RSS |

Archive for the ‘Publishing’ Category

What is Self-publishing?

Tuesday, November 10th, 2009

Self-publishing has become one of those umbrella terms used to categorise any rendering of printed (or digital) text that doesn’t come with an advance from the company bankrolling the release (or who would give you an advance if things weren’t so darn difficult in the industry right now). I’m self publishing as I write, and I’ll write more about it as the process continues, so I wanted to define the term as reference now – a bit of background so you know where I’m coming from.

“What is a Publisher? ?The Publisher is generally the person or body who takes the financial risk in making a product available. For example, if a product went on sale and sold no copies at all, the Publisher is usually the person or body who loses money. If you get paid anyway, you are likely to be a designer, printer, author or consultant of some kind.”

I lifted that from www.isbn.nielsenbook.co.uk – the people who’ll sort you out with an ISBN number (that you DON’T NEED) in the UK. It gives a good definition of what a publisher is, and if we’re extrapolating to define self-publishing, with “self” being you, you need to make sure you fit that description.

I’m assuming you’re also the author in this equation; if you’re not, you’re just a publisher, in which case you’ve got your own problems to deal with.

A self-publishing author, therefore, is someone paying to have his or her book printed. Note “printed”, not “published”. There’s a difference.

So what other acts of publication are routinely lumped in under the self-publishing umbrella?

Print on Demand (POD)
I looked into POD, and on the surface, it’s a great idea. A customer orders a book, it’s printed, and you get paid. Kind of. The returns on POD aren’t great, as there’s essentially a printer, publisher and distributer in the queue ahead of you taking a bite out of your pie. If you’ve written a non-fiction book on a specialist subject that you can sell for £20 or upward in paperback, POD can get you in touch with a large market quickly, and you can make a lot of cash. Otherwise, it’s fine as a hobby.

Publishing Services
I don’t know much about these, as the idea is flawed so I’ve never explored any further. When you send a submission off to a publishing house, you’re hoping they agree to print your book and send you a cheque for a couple of grand, not ask for a cheque and expect you to do all the marketing. Whichever way you look at it, this route is closest to the traditional view of vanity publishing.

Online Publication/Podcasting
This is a great way to get your work out there, and you’re in control. Unfortunately, until someone invents a replicator like they had in Star Trek that can knock up a printed book when you click download, there’s no good way to monetise this, and who wants to give their hard work away for free? EBooks? Kindle? I’ll leave those for another post.

Self-publishing, to me at least, means doing it yourself. You pay to get the books printed, you arrange retail or sell direct, and you handle the distribution. It’s a lot of work – a LOT of work – and there is significant financial risk involved, but – and here’s the important part for me – it’s a lot of fun!

Take control, get involved, learn the skills, meet the people, make a move. If you think your book is strong enough to risk £500-£1000 of your own money, and you have the enthusiasm, then find a printer, become a publisher yourself and collect 100% of the royalties. After tax…

I’m going to write about everything I experience in getting my book printed and into readers’ hands, so maybe I’ll be able to help with the technical aspects of how it’s done – the typesetting, print-ready pdf generation, ISBN numbers, copyright, and so on – but as for that stake money, yeah… you’re on your own.

Indie is the new Indie

Saturday, November 7th, 2009

I’ve been reading a lot of opinion likening the rise of indie/self publishing with the punk movement of the mid-seventies – the key similarity being the separation of the form away from the unaccepting mainstream. Thing is, punk rock offered something the current indie-publishing crowd don’t, and that’s a new voice. A new sound. Something different. I’m not saying punk rock was great – I want to listen to the Sex Pistols as much as I want to listen to freeform jazz – but they had something new to say, and it was that message that justified the departure from the status quo. If you look at most self-published books, they’re the same as the titles being churned out by the “traditional” publishing houses, only with less money spent on cover design and marketing. So they must be inferior, right? Otherwise they’d have a book deal? Well, no, but you could forgive any potential reader for thinking that.

Remember the UK indie music scene of the late-eighties, early-nineties? Bands like Ned’s Atomic Dustbin, Thousand Yard Stare, Power of Dreams – so many great bands putting out music on indie labels and reaching an audience, but unable, or unwilling, to make it into the top 40 (although, I think Ned’s managed it with “Trust”…). Their music wasn’t so different, but they were a bit dour, or downbeat, or scruffy, or just happy with the following they had. They made a living in their own niche, and they had fun doing it. That, if anywhere, is where the indie publishing crowd are heading.

It doesn’t have to end that way though. We just need a new voice. A new sound.

Why are novels 300 pages long, with a beginning, middle and end, three key ideas and plot reveals at 25% and 75% of the word count? Because that’s what people have grown to expect. But no one is expecting anything from the indie crowd, so why tie ourselves to those expectations? I love short novels  - say 150-200 pages – but so few are published as people want fatter books. Novels used to be shorter, but fashions changed. They can, and will, change again.

I’m not saying that my novel, Make a Move, is the answer, but it is different, both in structure and narrative style. I’m not saying I’m taking indie novels in a new direction, but someone who reads it and likes what I’ve done with my idea of what a novel can be, might. I’d like to meet that person, maybe have a beer and a conversation, and see what ideas emerge. Maybe if enough of us have conversations and support each other in breaking away from traditional ideas of what constitutes a novel, indie publishing can evolve into alternative publishing – offering a product that appeals to smaller markets, but which is no less valid for filling a niche. That difference is what would attract readers away from Amazon or Waterstones or, shudder, Tesco and back into independent bookshops. With fewer middlemen, there would be more money for writers, and fewer obstacles keeping writers and readers apart. It would be a new movement of interactive, responsive, original, daring and, above all, fun fiction.

Now that would be punk rock.