<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CinéManche &#187; Paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cinemanche.com/tag/paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cinemanche.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 15:32:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Never Mind the Quality, Feel the Narrative Thrust</title>
		<link>http://cinemanche.com/2009/11/30/never-mind-the-quality-feel-the-narrative-thrust/</link>
		<comments>http://cinemanche.com/2009/11/30/never-mind-the-quality-feel-the-narrative-thrust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 21:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Printing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Binding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dust Jacket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endpapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cinemanche.com/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My book&#8217;s been in the wild for three days now, and I&#8217;ve noticed a theme emerging in the responses I get when people take receipt of their copies &#8211; some variation on &#8220;oh, it&#8217;s a lot nicer than I expected&#8221;. Translation: &#8220;oh good, it&#8217;s not shit&#8221;. It&#8217;s flattering that people are impressed with the quality [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My book&#8217;s been in the wild for three days now, and I&#8217;ve noticed a theme emerging in the responses I get when people take receipt of their copies &#8211; some variation on &#8220;oh, it&#8217;s a lot nicer than I expected&#8221;. Translation: &#8220;oh good, it&#8217;s not shit&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s flattering that people are impressed with the quality of the product, but it&#8217;s also worrying that their expectations are so low. That got me thinking; if customer&#8217;s have so little faith in a self-publishing author to deliver a professionally printed book, does that also extend to writers&#8217; faith in their ability to produce one?</p>
<p>Probably, and that&#8217;s one misconception that needs kicking into touch right now.</p>
<p>One fact you might not be aware of: you have access to the same printers as the major publishing houses. It&#8217;s true; you can deal direct with the printers, and with the publishing industry so downbeat right now, a lot of printers are trying to attract indies and small presses in an effort to adapt and survive. The only difference between you and a major publisher is the order size (which has one minor implication I&#8217;ll detail below). Aside from that, it&#8217;s a level playing field.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me? Okay &#8211; let&#8217;s assume you&#8217;ve placed an order for 100 hardback books (a typical minimum for digital printing) and take a look at the anatomy of the end product.</p>
<ol>
<li>Dust Jacket &#8211; it&#8217;s a sheet of paper. They print your artwork on it, laminate it in gloss or matt for a nominal fee (if you choose) and wrap it around the book.</li>
<li>Binding &#8211; fabric-covered cardboard. I guess you could use some expensive fabric woven by Parisian chorus girls in their spare time, but as there&#8217;s a dust jacket hiding it from view, it&#8217;s not going to add much value. I can&#8217;t see any difference between my binding and any of the hundreds of &#8220;pro&#8221; books on my shelves.</li>
<li>Spine Embossing &#8211; this is a nice touch. I thought about saving the money, but I believe it does add value, and it&#8217;s useful to identify the book if the owner loses the dust jacket. All the printers ask for is a print-ready PDF with the lettering in black; they make up a &#8220;brass&#8221;, and use that to stamp the books.</li>
<li>Endpapers &#8211; these are the sheets of paper glued onto the inside of the book cover, joining them to the pages seamlessly. You can go for the same colour as your book&#8217;s body pages, but I think it looks nicer to go for a different colour &#8211; graphite in my case. These definitely add something to the look of the book, but you need to decide if it&#8217;s worth the extra cost. The endpapers my printer provided are very cool, with a thick, grainy texture.</li>
<li>Paper &#8211; this is the one area where large publishers have the option to go one better. Note that I said &#8220;option&#8221;; this isn&#8217;t a default choice. The papers available for use with digital presses are perfect for the job, but for larger print runs &#8211; over 1000 or so &#8211; litho presses become cost-effective, and these can handle thicker paper, which some publishers may choose to use. By &#8220;thicker&#8221;, I don&#8217;t mean that each sheet is visibly thicker than the lighter, digital-friendly weights; what I mean is that the paper responds differently when you bend a half-inch thickness of it, and it may be slightly more opaque. This is the kind of difference only a borderline-OCD perfectionist like me would notice, but it&#8217;s something you can investigate yourself.</li>
</ol>
<p>So that&#8217;s it. There&#8217;s nothing else to a book. Okay &#8211; so there are custom jobs you could point to; my hardback copy of Rant by <a href="http://chuckpalahniuk.net/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/chuckpalahniuk.net/?referer=');">Chuck Palahniuk</a> has a crazy image printed inside the dust jacket. I spotted it for the first time when I was inspecting the book as research for my print run, over a year after I read it.</p>
<p>Are you convinced? Are you happy that your self-published book won&#8217;t look like the poor cousin on a mainstream-fed bookcase? If you are, that&#8217;s one less barrier between you and your readers. If you&#8217;re not, just check out some printers and ask for samples; see for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://cinemanche.com/2009/11/30/never-mind-the-quality-feel-the-narrative-thrust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

